The analysis is interesting but you must clarify how exactly the comb or spine analogy works with the particularities of the site and of the topography. I think that the idea of spine and ribs is more interesting than the comb one. But if you take it further, it must be as complex and flexible as a spine, and at the moment, the scheme looks very rigid and planar. I think it would be worth while to work very closely on the section of each "vertebra" and to figure how you connect them to each other and how you adapt it to the topography and situation.
The analysis is interesting but you must clarify how exactly the comb or spine analogy works with the particularities of the site and of the topography.
השבמחקI think that the idea of spine and ribs is more interesting than the comb one. But if you take it further, it must be as complex and flexible as a spine, and at the moment, the scheme looks very rigid and planar.
I think it would be worth while to work very closely on the section of each "vertebra" and to figure how you connect them to each other and how you adapt it to the topography and situation.